Every business starts with a plan, but a plan on paper does not run a company. Someone has to decide who does what, which teams exist, and who reports to whom. That is exactly what the organisation process does. It takes a business plan and turns it into a working structure of people, tasks, and reporting lines. For B.Com students, this topic is not just an exam chapter. It explains why every company, from a neighbourhood retail store to a listed corporation, has an org chart, job titles, and departments in the first place.
The organisation process is generally broken down into five connected steps: determining objectives, identifying and grouping activities, allotting duties, developing relationships, and integrating activities. These steps are sequential and cumulative. Skip one, and the structure that follows tends to develop gaps, duplicated work, or unclear accountability. Let’s walk through each step and see how it plays out in a real business.
Table of Contents
- Organising comes right after planning
- Step 1: Determining objectives
- Step 2: Identifying and grouping activities
- Listing out the activities
- Grouping activities: the basics of departmentalisation
- Step 3: Allotting duties
- Step 4: Developing relationships
- Step 5: Integrating activities
- Why this process matters beyond the exam
Organising comes right after planning
In the standard sequence of management functions, organising is the step that follows planning. Once objectives and strategies are fixed, someone still has to decide how the work required to hit those targets gets divided among people. Organising has been described by management thinkers such as Theo Haimann and Luther Gulick as the process of defining and grouping the activities of an enterprise and establishing authority relationships among them. Put simply, planning decides what needs to happen, and organising decides who will make it happen and how the different pieces will fit together.
Step 1: Determining objectives
The organisation process cannot begin in a vacuum. It starts with a clear statement of what the business, department, or project is trying to achieve. If the objective of a company is to expand into a new city, the entire structure built afterward, teams, roles, reporting lines, has to serve that specific goal.
This is why objectives need to be specific rather than vague. “Grow the business” is not something a manager can organise around. “Set up three new retail outlets in Pune within a year” is. Organisational plans and their goals shape how organising unfolds and what kind of structure eventually results from it. As a business grows or its strategy shifts, this first step doesn’t happen once and get forgotten. Objectives get revisited, and the structure around them gets revised too.
Step 2: Identifying and grouping activities
Once objectives are clear, the next task is figuring out everything that needs to be done to reach them, and then organising that list into sensible units. This step itself happens in two parts.
Listing out the activities
The first part is identification. A manager lists every task required, without worrying yet about who will do it. For a retail chain opening new stores, this list might include site selection, store fit-out, hiring staff, inventory procurement, marketing the launch, and setting up billing systems. This work is divided into manageable activities so that duplication is avoided and the workload is fairly shared among employees.
Grouping activities: the basics of departmentalisation
The second part is grouping. Related activities are clustered into departments, a process known as departmentalisation. Businesses typically choose one of a few common bases for this grouping, depending on their size, products, and geographic spread.
| Basis of grouping | How it works | Typical example |
|---|---|---|
| Functional | Activities are grouped by the nature of the work, such as production, finance, marketing, or HR | A manufacturing company with separate marketing and production departments |
| Product-based | Activities are grouped around a specific product line or category | A consumer goods company with separate divisions for soaps, snacks, and beverages |
| Geographic | Activities are grouped by region or territory | A bank with separate zonal offices for North, South, East, and West India |
| Customer-based | Activities are grouped around distinct customer segments | A bank with separate divisions for retail customers and corporate clients |
None of these approaches is universally “correct.” A small business with one product line usually finds a functional structure easiest to manage, while a diversified company with multiple product categories often benefits more from product-based grouping. What matters is that similar activities end up together, so that people doing related work can coordinate easily and specialise in their area.
Step 3: Allotting duties
With departments in place, individual jobs still need to be created and assigned to specific people. This is where the organisation process moves from structure to people. Duties should match an individual’s skill, qualification, and capability. Jobs are allocated to members of each department based on their skills and competencies, so that there is a proper match between the job and the individual’s ability.
Getting this step wrong is common in small and growing businesses. A founder might hand a marketing role to someone with strong sales instincts but no marketing background simply because that person is available. In the short term this may work, but it usually creates friction later, when the mismatch between the person’s skills and the job’s demands starts showing up as poor output or high turnover. Careful duty allotment at this stage saves a lot of restructuring further down the line.
Step 4: Developing relationships
Assigning duties is not enough on its own. Every employee needs to know who they report to, who reports to them, and how much authority they actually have to make decisions. This step establishes those reporting relationships and, in doing so, creates the organisation’s hierarchy.
Three concepts sit at the centre of this step, and B.Com students will recognise them from delegation theory:
- Authority: the right given to an individual to make decisions and direct the work of subordinates.
- Responsibility: the obligation of a subordinate to properly complete the task assigned to them.
- Accountability: the superior’s continuing answerability for the final outcome, even after work has been delegated.
Authority flows downward through the organisation while responsibility flows upward, and care needs to be taken that authority and responsibility given to any individual stay proportionate to each other. A manager who is held responsible for a sales target but denied the authority to hire staff or approve discounts is being set up to fail. This is also the stage where a business decides its span of management, meaning how many subordinates a single manager can effectively supervise. A narrow span creates a tall structure with more levels of hierarchy, while a wide span creates a flatter one. Retail chains with large frontline teams, for instance, often lean toward wider spans at the store level to keep decision-making fast.
Step 5: Integrating activities
The final step ties all the previous ones together. Once activities are divided, grouped, staffed, and given clear reporting lines, someone has to make sure the departments actually work with each other instead of operating as isolated silos. This is coordination, and it is what turns a collection of departments into a functioning organisation.
The organising process is generally treated as an ongoing sequence of steps that managers examine and revisit as plans and goals continue to change. Integration is not a one-time event either. As new products launch, teams grow, or markets shift, the connections between departments need to be actively maintained. A retail business, for example, needs its marketing team, inventory team, and store operations team constantly exchanging information around a festive sale. Without that integration, marketing might promote a product that has already run out of stock, wasting both the campaign budget and customer goodwill.
Why this process matters beyond the exam
These five steps explain a lot about why businesses look the way they do. A well-organised company has clarity of roles, which reduces confusion and duplicated effort. Clear-cut responsibility and authority relationships between different levels help ensure cooperation between individuals and groups. It also gives a company room to adapt. When a business restructures after a merger, launches a new product line, or expands into new regions, it is essentially cycling through these same five steps again with new objectives.
For a B.Com student, understanding this process is useful well beyond a management exam. Whether you eventually work in a startup, a family business, or a large corporate, you will experience the organisation process firsthand, in the form of your job description, your reporting manager, and the department you sit in. Recognising the logic behind that structure makes it easier to understand your own role, and where the gaps might be.
What do you think? If you look at a business you’re familiar with, does its structure actually follow its stated objectives, or does it feel like the two have drifted apart over time? And which of these five steps do you think businesses tend to get wrong most often: grouping activities, allotting duties, or integrating them?
References
- https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/business-studies/organising-meaning-importance-and-process/
- https://www.businessmanagementideas.com/management/functions/5-main-steps-involved-in-organizing-process-management/7546
- https://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-12/business-studies/chapter-5/
- https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/principles-of-management/creating-organizational-structure/the-organizational-process
Leave a Reply