Not every company writes a cheque when it wants a factory shed, a patent, or the experience of a seasoned promoter. Sometimes it simply hands over shares instead. This is called issue of shares for consideration other than cash, and it is one of the more practical tools available to a company that wants to acquire assets or reward its founders without touching its cash reserves. Understanding how these transactions are structured legally, and how they are recorded in the books, is a core part of corporate accounting.
Table of Contents
- What “consideration other than cash” really means
- Scenario one: buying assets or a business from a vendor
- Recording the purchase
- Recording the share issue
- A worked example
- Scenario two: rewarding promoters for their contribution
- Why the choice between Goodwill and Incorporation Cost matters
- The legal backbone: Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act
- How the non-cash consideration is carried in the books afterwards
- Disclosure in the financial statements
- Why this matters beyond the exam
- What do you think?
What “consideration other than cash” really means
Usually, when a company issues shares, it invites applications from investors, collects application money, and later calls up the balance in instalments. Cash flows in at every stage. But sometimes a company gets what it needs – an asset, a running business, or a service – without any money changing hands. Instead, it allots fully paid-up shares directly to the person who supplied that asset or service.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India’s study notes point out that shares can be issued in direct exchange for land, buildings, or other assets, and also in payment for services rendered by promoters or professionals who helped set up the company. Two situations dominate this topic in practice: shares issued to vendors for assets or a whole business, and shares issued to promoters for the effort of forming the company.
Scenario one: buying assets or a business from a vendor
When a company wants machinery, land, or an entire running business, it can negotiate a price with the vendor and settle it by issuing shares instead of cash. Accountants always treat this as two separate transactions, not one combined entry: the purchase itself, and the allotment of shares that settles the payment.
Recording the purchase
First, the assets acquired are debited and the vendor is credited with the purchase consideration. If the company takes over an entire business rather than individual assets, it also takes over the liabilities. Any difference between the purchase price and the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill, if the price paid is higher, or capital reserve, if the price paid is lower.
Recording the share issue
Second, once the purchase consideration is fixed, the company allots shares to settle that amount. The vendor’s account is debited, and share capital is credited. If the shares are issued at a premium, the securities premium account is also credited for the difference between the issue price and the face value.
A worked example
Suppose Sahil Ltd. purchases machinery valued at โน6,00,000 from Kashish Ltd. and agrees to settle the entire amount through shares of โน100 face value each. If the shares are issued at par, Kashish Ltd. receives 6,000 shares. If instead they are issued at a premium of โน20, the issue price becomes โน120, and Kashish Ltd. receives only 5,000 shares for the same purchase consideration. Issuing at a premium always reduces the number of shares handed over, because each share now settles a larger portion of the debt.
| Transaction | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Purchase of machinery | Machinery A/c – โน6,00,000 | Kashish Ltd. A/c – โน6,00,000 |
| Shares issued at par | Kashish Ltd. A/c – โน6,00,000 | Share Capital A/c – โน6,00,000 |
| Shares issued at premium | Kashish Ltd. A/c – โน6,00,000 | Share Capital A/c – โน5,00,000; Securities Premium A/c – โน1,00,000 |
Scenario two: rewarding promoters for their contribution
Promoters put in the early groundwork that gets a company off the ground: arranging capital, negotiating with regulators, and assembling the founding team. Companies sometimes compensate this effort with shares rather than a fee. Because promoters have not supplied a physical asset in return, the debit side of this entry cannot simply go to an asset account the way a machinery purchase would.
Accountants instead debit a Goodwill account, or an Incorporation Cost account (also called formation expenses), and credit share capital. GeeksforGeeks explains that this treatment reflects the promoters’ role in building the company’s reputation and goodwill – value that never appears as a physical asset but still justifies compensation in shares. Underwriters who accept shares in lieu of their underwriting fee are handled the same way.
Why the choice between Goodwill and Incorporation Cost matters
Both accounts eventually reduce the company’s reported net worth, but they carry different implications. Goodwill is an intangible asset that many companies choose to write off over a few years or test for impairment, while incorporation cost is more commonly treated as a preliminary expense written off against future profits or securities premium. Students often lose marks simply by picking the wrong account for the situation described in a question, so it helps to read carefully whether the shares are compensating for an intangible advantage the promoter brought to the business, or simply for the cost of setting the company up.
The legal backbone: Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act
None of this is left to informal negotiation. When an Indian company issues shares to specific persons – including for non-cash consideration – rather than through a rights issue or a public offer, the transaction falls under the preferential allotment route governed by Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014.
This route comes with real safeguards. The company needs a special resolution passed by its shareholders before it can proceed, and it cannot decide on its own what the asset is worth or what price to fix for the shares. A registered valuer must certify the fair value of both the shares being issued and the non-cash consideration being received, and this valuation report has to be placed before shareholders and eventually filed with the Registrar of Companies. The purpose is straightforward: to stop a company from inflating the value of an asset, or undervaluing its own shares, purely to benefit an insider such as a promoter or a related vendor.
How the non-cash consideration is carried in the books afterwards
Valuation is not a one-time formality that ends once the shares are allotted. Where the non-cash consideration takes the form of a depreciable or amortisable asset – machinery, a building, a patent – it has to be carried on the balance sheet in line with applicable accounting standards, exactly as required under Rule 13 of the Share Capital and Debentures Rules. In practice, this means the asset gets depreciated or amortised over its useful life like any other asset the company owns, rather than sitting on the books forever at the value agreed on allotment day.
Disclosure in the financial statements
Shares issued for consideration other than cash cannot quietly blend into the rest of a company’s share capital as though cash had actually changed hands. Companies are required to disclose them separately in the notes to accounts under share capital, mentioning the number of such shares, the class they belong to, and the period in which they were allotted. This disclosure gives investors and auditors a clear picture of how much of the company’s capital base came from genuine cash subscription, and how much was built through asset or service swaps instead.
Why this matters beyond the exam
This is not a purely academic exercise. Startups short on cash frequently pay early vendors, consultants, or even landlords partly in equity. Established companies use share swaps during acquisitions instead of raising fresh debt. Being able to tell when an asset entry should be kept separate from a share issue entry, and when a promoter’s contribution belongs in a Goodwill account rather than an asset account, is a skill that carries directly into company audits, mergers work, and corporate finance roles.
What do you think?
If you were valuing shares issued to a promoter purely for services rendered, how would you decide whether that value belongs in a Goodwill account or an Incorporation Cost account? And does the registered valuer requirement under Section 62(1)(c) go far enough to stop companies from overvaluing non-cash consideration to benefit insiders, or do you see gaps in how it is enforced?
References
- https://live.icai.org/bos/vcc-2nd-batch-recorded-lectures/pdf/PPT_notes_chapter%2010_unit%202%20(1).pdf
- https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/accountancy/issue-of-share-for-consideration-other-than-cash-accounting-for-share-capital/
- https://taxguru.in/company-law/preferential-issue-shares-companies-act-2013.html
- https://www.mondaq.com/india/shareholders/1748512/beyond-cheques-and-wire-transfers-structuring-and-regulating-consideration-other-than-cash-in-corporate-transactions
- https://ca2013.com/rule-13-companies-share-capital-and-debentures-rules-2014/
Leave a Reply